Learners’ self-assessment as a measure to evaluate the effectiveness of research ethics and integrity training: can we rely on self-reports?
Authors
Anu Tammeleht & Erika Löfström
Description
While the most prevalent means to measure the effectiveness of research ethics and integrity training formats is using learners’ self-assessment, there is a need for reliable and feasible self-assessment tools to evaluate the level of understanding. The aim of the study was to design a reliable tool and test its accuracy in various training contexts. The current study utilized a design-based research (DBR) approach. Data were collected from 401 participants in training sessions and ten experts were involved in tool evaluation. The results indicate that in the context of research ethics and integrity learners can quite accurately (more than 80%) evaluate their level of understanding with the designed self-reflection form. The research revealed that participants who assessed themselves to have higher levels of understanding or who used the tool several times were more likely to provide well-elaborated descriptions of their learning that matched their indicated level of understanding.
Keywords
Research ethics and integrity training; effectiveness; effectiveness; design-based research (DBR); self-report; accuracy of self-assessment
Open document ›
Latest deliverables and publications
18.12.2025
Report on pilot-tests of training materials and tools
16.12.2025
Report on contextually sensitive framework for defining QRPs
10.12.2025
Large-scale measurement instruments on medium and long-term training effects adapted to the needs of a variety of target groups and different fields/domain
10.12.2025
Behavioral insights for improving research integrity
3.12.2025