Publications
Erika Löfström, Tom Lindemann, Fenneke Blom, Natalie Evans, Mariette van den Hoven, Giulia Inguaggiato, Panagiotis Kavouras, Dirk Lanzerath, Julia Priess-Buchheit, Rita Santos, Anu Tammeleht, P. J. Wall, Linda Zollitsch
Fostering Research Integrity through Training: The training materials of four EU-funded projects through the lens of pedagogical underpinnings and three taxonomies of learning
Open ›
Ian Slesinger & Kadri Simm
The Politicization of Research Ethics and Integrity and its Implications for Research Governance
Open ›
Prince Ekene Nnaemeka
Ethical theories in doctoral students’ discussions of ethical dilemmas in research
Open ›
Signe Mežinska & Susanne van den Hooff
The role of senior researchers in promoting good science: Obstacles and enablers
Open ›
Anu Tammeleht & Erika Löfström
How do you know if research ethics and integrity training is effective? – Overview of prior literature
Open ›
Anu Tammeleht & Erika Löfström
Measuring ethics training effectiveness – introducing a toolbox
Open ›
Tammeleht, A., Antoniou, J., de la C. Bernabe, Rosemarie, Chapin, Carole, van den Hooff, Susanne, Mbanya, Vivian N., Parder, Mari-Liisa, Sairio, Anni, Videnoja, Kalle & Löfström, Erika
Manifestations of research ethics and integrity leadership in national surveys – cases of Estonia, Finland, Norway, France and the Netherlands
Open ›
Rowena Rodrigues & Daniel Pizzolato
Insights on the Socio-Economic Impacts of Research Misconduct
Open ›
Ian Slesinger, Jana Dilger, Richa Kumar, Julie Vinders, Rowena Rodrigues, Kadri Simm, Jay Zameska, Heldi Lang, Susanne van den Hooff, Daniele Fanelli, Alina Coman, Tonje Husum, Anu Tammeleht, Erika Löfström, Signe Mezinska, Eliza Lasmane
Data sets for D1.1 (Insights from the literature review on behavioural ethics, moral psychology & case-based methodologies and review of real-life case studies of research misconduct )
Open ›
Anu Tammeleht & Erika Löfström
Learners’ self-assessment as a measure to evaluate the effectiveness of research ethics and integrity training: can we rely on self-reports?
Open ›
Deliverables
Filter
ALL
WP1
WP2
WP3
WP4
WP5
WP6
WP7
WP8
D6.3
Report on pilot-tests of training materials and tools
Open ›
D3.1
Report on contextually sensitive framework for defining QRPs
Open ›
D4.2
Large-scale measurement instruments on medium and long-term training effects adapted to the needs of a variety of target groups and different fields/domain
Open ›
D3.2
Behavioral insights for improving research integrity
Open ›
D1.2
Systematic review of validated instruments for measuring research misconduct and questionable research practices
Open ›
D5.1
The BEYOND Guidelines for Preventing and Addressing Research Misconduct
Open ›
D4.1
Report on the methodologies and measurements explored, and guidelines including functionality, feasibility and reliability of each method for the assessment of training initiatives and interventions in RI
Open ›
D6.2
Report on supplementary trainer guide and new training materials on RE/RI
Open ›
D2.2
Report on the results of the BEYOND public consultation
Open ›
WP1
Data sets for D1.1 (Insights from the literature review on behavioural ethics, moral psychology & case-based methodologies and review of real-life case studies of research misconduct )
Open ›
D8.2
Ethics Management Plan
Open ›
D8.1
Data Management Plan
Open ›
D7.3
Policy Brief
Open ›
D7.2
Dissemination, Exploitation and Communication Plan
Open ›
D1.1
Insights from the literature review on behavioural ethics, moral psychology & case-based methodologies and review of real-life case studies of research misconduct
Open ›
D7.1
The Dissemination, Exploitation and Communication Plan
Open ›
D6.1
Strategy for the development of supplementary trainer guide and new training materials and tools
Open ›